What Your First Meeting With a Music Attorney Might Look Like — Part 3 of a Series
by Silvia Passiflora, Editor | Scriptaluna
April 8, 2026
I'd been putting off calling a lawyer for years. In my imagination, the clock started ticking the moment someone picked up the phone — every minute billable, every question costing something. I filed four trademarks on my own rather than make that call. One was later voided. The fees I'd paid were gone. The USPTO doesn't offer refunds.
What changed wasn't urgency. It was familiarity. I'd been following a music attorney on social media long enough that his voice felt known to me — practical, unalarming, fluent in the world I was trying to navigate. By the time a situation arose that needed a professional, reaching out felt less like calling a stranger and more like finally introducing myself to someone I'd been listening to for a while.
The situation that finally pushed me to make the call was practical and pressing. I was preparing Grammy submissions — a process with its own weight and timeline — and trying simultaneously to resolve a co-writer share on my ASCAP account. The co-writer was difficult to reach. Basic information I needed to complete the registration wasn't coming. And underneath the logistical frustration was a quieter concern: an unresolved co-writing agreement meant someone else could release a song attached to my name at exactly the moment I needed my name to mean something specific. I needed a professional to be the clear, calm voice between me and that situation.
Booking the consultation was its own education. I chose the half-hour slot deliberately — every minute would count, so I came with a list. What I didn't expect was that the booking wasn't immediately confirmed. He needed to check first for any conflicts of interest before agreeing to take me on. That detail alone reframed the experience.
This wasn't a transaction. It was the beginning of a professional relationship — one that required vetting on both sides.
In that half hour, he listened, assessed, and made his recommendations. Then came a separate engagement: an additional fee to draft the letter, my approval before it went out, and then he sent it. The other party's response was telling. He wanted to know why I'd involved a lawyer — we were friends, he said. I thought about that. We were acquaintances in music circles. Friendship implies a baseline of communication I'd never actually had with him.
Nearly a year after that first half-hour, I booked a full hour. The landscape had grown — trademarks, copyrights, multiple moving parts that needed a longer conversation. What I didn't expect was that the meeting would include strategy alongside legal counsel. He offered a perspective on my situation that I hadn't been able to see from inside it. When he said it, it felt right. That's the kind of clarity that accumulates when someone knows your work over time. In between our two formal meetings I'd reached out on smaller matters as they arose. What I've come to think of as a yearly paid consultation — a real sit-down to assess where things stand — is something worth building into how you run your creative business.
One thing I learned along the way: if your attorney is about to reach out to a collaborator on your behalf, consider giving that person a heads-up first. A simple message saying that paperwork is coming and that it's standard — not personal — can change the entire tone of what follows. One session musician I worked with didn't understand why he needed to sign anything at all, since he didn't own rights to the recording.
That's exactly why he needed to sign. His signature confirmed the arrangement that protected everyone, including him.
I'll admit something. I cried during that first meeting. I wasn't embarrassed. Given what I was protecting — a Grammy reputation I was just beginning to build, years of work that had no documentation behind it — I felt certain that he, of all people, would understand the stakes. A music attorney who is also a musician, who has read thousands of contracts, who has sat across from artists at every stage of their careers — he would know exactly what those tears meant.
That kind of understanding has no price tag. It isn't something a well-meaning friend can offer, no matter how many albums they've made. It comes from someone who has seen what happens when the paperwork isn't there.
What the process gave me wasn't paranoia. It was legal literacy — and that's a different thing entirely. Legal literacy means knowing what questions to ask before you're in a situation that requires them. It means understanding that a contract isn't an accusation. It's a document that frees both parties to focus on the work instead of the ambiguity around it.
I can't spend my creative energy chasing people down for basic information. I can't afford to close myself off from opportunities because paperwork makes someone else uncomfortable. The work is too important and the time it takes to make it is too precious.
An attorney doesn't just draft documents. Over time, they help you understand what you're building and what it's worth protecting. That's not a luxury. For any artist serious about a lasting career, it's infrastructure.
To read more content like this, visit Editor's Letters